<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presentation from AAR 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philipclayton.net/2009/12/31/presentation-from-aar-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philipclayton.net/2009/12/31/presentation-from-aar-2009/</link>
	<description>Reimagining the Future of Faith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:27:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The purpose of theological education &#171; James Pedlar</title>
		<link>http://philipclayton.net/2009/12/31/presentation-from-aar-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>The purpose of theological education &#171; James Pedlar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clayton.ctr4process.org/?p=214#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] with a small circle of friends who are interested in the same obscure topics.  Philip Clayton recently posted a video on his website criticizing academic theology (including his own work) for this very reason. He may [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with a small circle of friends who are interested in the same obscure topics.  Philip Clayton recently posted a video on his website criticizing academic theology (including his own work) for this very reason. He may [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://philipclayton.net/2009/12/31/presentation-from-aar-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clayton.ctr4process.org/?p=214#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Phil, encouraging words for those outside the academic circle. Reminds me of a conference called Renaissance Weekend. One&#039;s entire family is invited. Everyone participates on multiple panels throughout the week. Everyone is integral - learning from everyone else at all times. Many of the most profound ideas at Renaissance on religion and spirituality come from the non-academics / non-theologians. 

As you noted in your talk, virtual social connectivity is transforming the way we “do” theology. Certainly there&#039;s a place for academic study of Xn religion, yet religion is by nature applied, deeply personal, and ubiquitous-shared-communal-participative. I&#039;m looking forward to continuing the conversation with you at Theology After Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, encouraging words for those outside the academic circle. Reminds me of a conference called Renaissance Weekend. One&#8217;s entire family is invited. Everyone participates on multiple panels throughout the week. Everyone is integral &#8211; learning from everyone else at all times. Many of the most profound ideas at Renaissance on religion and spirituality come from the non-academics / non-theologians. </p>
<p>As you noted in your talk, virtual social connectivity is transforming the way we “do” theology. Certainly there&#8217;s a place for academic study of Xn religion, yet religion is by nature applied, deeply personal, and ubiquitous-shared-communal-participative. I&#8217;m looking forward to continuing the conversation with you at Theology After Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
